In Titus Adronicus one aspect of the
play that really catches my attention is how the characters interact with their
children. Titus Adronicus, Tamora, and Aaron are all three different
characters; characters with different characteristics but the one common trait
between each of them is that the care for their offspring. Although we see how
they care about their own children it is very obvious that they do not care
about taking action on other characters children. The first interaction between
a character and their offspring comes in act one, scene one when we see how
Tamora gives a plea to Titus asking him not to sacrifice her eldest son. In her
speech to Titus she says, “Stay Roman brethren!-
Gracious conqueror; Victorious Titus, rue the tears I shed, a mother’s tears in
passion for her son. And if thy sons
were ever dear to thee, O think my son to be as dear to me… but must my sons be
slaughtered in the streets for valiant doings in their country’s cause?” (15). In
this scene it is shown that Tamora cares deeply about her son, but cannot do
anything to save him. In this same act we see how the characters in this play
does not care about others offspring, or how they would feel about losing their
child. After Titus orders Tamoras son to be sacrificed he says to her, “Patient
yourself, madam, and pardon me. These are their brethren whom your Goths beheld
alive and dead, and for their brethren slain religiously they ask a sacrifice. To
this you son is marked, and ide he must, T’appease their groaning shadows are
gone” (15). This speech shows that although Titus suffers the loss of his own
sons he does not care about taking away someone elses.
The next character that demonstrates how
the characters in this play interact with their child is Aaron. Although Aaron
is this cruel person who does not care what he does to others or who he kills,
when his baby comes into the picture we see a different side to him. Instead of
the cruel insensitive guy, we get a character who care about his son and does
not mind sacracficing his own life as long as his son will be okay. We see
Aarons plea in act five, scene one. Aaron asks Lucius to swear to him that his
child shall survive. Aaron pleas to Lucius swearing on the God that Lucius
believes in that he shall survive. To keep his son alive Aaron gives all the
details of his crimes. Aaron reveals
the parenthood of the child, the rapists of Lavinia, the murderers of
Bassianus, his own trickery to get Titus's hand; finally, he takes credit for
every act, saying, "And what not done, that thou hast cause to rue, /
Wherein I has no stroke of mischief in it?" (171).
In conclusion, we see how it does not matter the rank of
the character, the evil of the character, or moral rights of the characters; in
the end they all have one aspect in common. Each character would do anything
they could to protect their children, but they would not think twice about
hurting someone else’s child. I found this interesting because it had a great
deal to do with the play, and the scenes that happened. All these characters no
matter how heartless they may be all compare in the one way that they try to
save their children if not anything else.
There is one instance to consider, which makes an argument against what you have made: the scene where Titus kills his own son. However, I would argue that upon Titus return from so much bloodshed in battle, he is suffering from a tremendous case of post traumatic stress disorder. He was probably so swept up with his patriotism and the treasonous nature of his own sons' actions that he was mentally driven back to some other battle, some other foe, some dark space that he was used to fighting in. I doubt that he would have even realized who he was murdering as he stabbed his son.
ReplyDelete